The decision between native development and IONIC depends on several variables, including the target audience, money, and project needs. Projects that require cross-platform interoperability, strict deadlines, and little funding are best suited for IONIC. Apps requiring complicated animations, high performance, or hardware-specific functionality should be developed natively. The choice should ultimately be made in light of your app’s particular requirements and objectives.Apply
The answer is that while IONIC works well for many different types of applications—including complicated ones—it might not be the ideal option for apps that require a lot of resources, such as 3D games or apps that require a lot of video processing. It could be better to use native development in some situations. However, IONIC is a perfect and efficient option for most commercial, utility, and content-based apps.Apply
The following are some major benefits of developing IONIC apps:
cross-platform compatibility, which permits the use of a single codebase across several platforms.
a wide range of UI elements for building aesthetically pleasing applications.
Simple Angular and other front-end library integration.
Testing and development are done quickly, with live reload capabilities.
a robust documentation base and a thriving community.
Because of its cross-platform capabilities, which cut down on development time and expenses, IONIC is a well-liked option for app development. It is a flexible and effective alternative for developing mobile apps since it provides a large selection of pre-built UI components, easy connection with well-known frontend libraries, and a vibrant community.Apply